RCL Easter 5B
6 May 2012
Saint Faith's Anglican Church
Vancouver BC
Early in my tenure at Vancouver
School of Theology one of our students, Susan Lukey, came up with the idea of
having a Saint Nicholas Day party for the children. She had been raised in a home with a
significant Ukrainian heritage, so the celebration of Saint Nicholas Day came
naturally to her. When she approached me
about this idea, she asked me to do two things:
(i) play the role of Saint Nicholas and (ii) prepare a story for the children.
Now the first task, dressing up like
Saint Nicholas, was an easy thing for a high church Anglican to do. Susan made a miter and a crozier for me. I found a wonderful Navajo ring that could
double as an episcopal ring. I could
wear my traditional alb, amice and cincture with a red stole and chasuble. We were set.
The crafting of a story was more
daunting to me. I had never really been
into so-called 'children's sermons' and I was afraid that I would not be able
to create a story that would capture the children's imagination. Then I had a brainstorm: I would craft a story with David, Anna and
Owen providing the models for the roles of Bishop Nicholas' fictional nephews
and niece. The story began to take shape
and it remains one of my favourite creations.
The children, both my own and others, loved the story and it became a
required part of every Saint Nicholas' Day celebration.
But one Saint Nicholas Day a young
man, Marc Lepine, entered the Ecole Polytechnique in Montréal and proceeded to
kill a number of young women, simply because they were women. While I continued to play Saint Nicholas from
time to time, the anniversary of the Montréal killings remained very fresh at a
school such as VST with its long commitment to women's issues and development.
But in recent years I have been able
to resurrect my story and to use it on a few occasions. In part I am able to do this because of Saint
Nicholas himself. While it is anachronistic
to portray him as an early feminist, Saint Nicholas was well known for his
efforts improve the status of the poor, especially young women who were often
sold into slavery. His story is a
partial antidote to the tragedy of the Ecole Polytechnique.
Stories are a core element of
religious faith. One might even argue
that stories are the primary glue that holds religious traditions
together. Recently I was listening to
'Ideas' on CBC Radio One. James Karse, a
scholar of religion, was commenting on the wide variety of beliefs within any
religious tradition. He pointed out that
Yale University Press had recently published a series on Christian creeds ---
five volumes full of authoritative Christian statements about what Christians
should and should not believe. The glue,
however, that holds the Christian community together, sometimes loosely,
sometimes tightly, is not found in these volumes. That glue is found in the story of a Jewish
rabbi from the northern region of Galilee whose life and teaching changed the
world as we know it.
Another reason stories are the glue
of religious traditions is this: There
is not always a direct correspondence between what a story says and what a
story means. If you and I disagree about
what we should believe, we often pass quickly from debate, the effort to
persuade the other to our point of view, to conflict, the effort to coerce the
other to our point of view. Stories do
not lend themselves as easily to debate and conflict. Stories tend to engage us in conversation,
the effort to understand the perspective of the other person. As we enter into conversation with each
other, our world is enriched and deepened even as we realize that there is
still more to the story than either of our perspectives can reveal. James Karse would say that our conversation
leads to a community where each participant is warmed by the contributions of
others and where mystery, the deep truth we are all trying to comprehend,
embraces us.
Today's readings are invitations to
enter into stories that gave rise to two religious communities.
In our reading from Exodus we hear God entering into the covenant with
the Hebrews who have come out of Egypt and who are on the path to becoming the
people of Israel. They are told that
they are to be a priestly people who will be a sign to all peoples of the
holiness of the God who brought them from slavery into freedom. Everything else in the Hebrew scriptures can
be understood as the community's struggle to understand what being a covenant
people means.
In
some texts being a covenant people will mean being separate from all other
peoples. In other texts being a covenant
people will mean being a beacon to others.
In still other texts being a covenant people will mean being open to
bringing others into the covenantal relationship with God that the people of
Israel enjoy. In the Mishnah and Talmud,
the two authoritative reflections on the Hebrew scriptures created by the
rabbis in the centuries after the destruction of the Temple in 70 ce, there is no attempt to erase
differing interpretations of the meaning of text. All are allowed to gather around the text
like campers around a fire who hear a story being told and try to ponder its
meaning and its ending.
In
our second reading from the Acts of the Apostles the early Christian community
is wrestling with the implications of the story of Jesus of Nazareth. There are some members of the community who
believe that the story means the redemption of the Jewish people and that
membership in the community of Jesus' disciples is limited solely to Jews and
to those who are willing to become Jews.
Others are wondering whether the story of Jesus has broader
implications. It is their interpretation
of the story that we hear today.
In
the Torah, the first five books of the Hebrew scriptures, eunuchs are forbidden
to be members of the covenant people.
Perhaps their membership is forbidden because they cannot fulfill the
command to be fruitful and multiply, perhaps because castration was often
practiced by various non-Hebrew religions, but they were excluded. By the time of the Exile, however, attitudes
seem to be shifting and the prophet we sometimes call 'Second' Isaiah, will
write that God will welcome eunuchs into the promised reign of God.
Is
it a coincidence that the writer of Acts has the eunuch reading a passage from Isaiah? Is it a coincidence that Philip, one of the
so-called 'deacons' of Acts, has a Greek name not a Hebrew name? Whatever we may wish to draw from the details
of the story, the message is clear: In
the new covenant of Jesus all are welcome, even foreign eunuchs. One of the tragedies of the history of the
Christian community is that our 'yes' to Ethiopian eunuchs eventually became a
'no' to Jewish believers in Jesus who found themselves marginalized and eventually
persecuted by their non-Jewish sisters and brothers.
My
friends, we have a story to share with the world. It is a story that still has meaning for
twenty-first-century North Americans who are struggling with all the ups and
downs, the successes and the failures, the joys and the sorrows of living in a
complex world that seems to foster loneliness and separation rather than
community and communion. It is a story
that we not only tell but that we live.
The
story of Jesus of Nazareth did not end with his death and resurrection. As the gospel according to John puts, Jesus
is the vine and we are the branches. The
story continues to grow and to reach out beyond its original historical and
geographical location. The story
continues to be told in the lives of women, men and children whose 'hearts are
fired up', whose 'minds are fired up' and whose 'souls are fired up'. The story continues to be told when people
ask questions about what the story means and when communities such as ours
raise our distinctive voices to share what we believe the story to mean.
The
Christian story is a story about relationships rather than, a story about
communities rather than institutions.
It's a story worth sharing with others to start up a conversation with
them about what it means. So let the
story-telling begin. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment